RiskProof scores the documents you already have — policies, risk registers, training records — against your state's psychosocial hazard requirements, and shows you exactly where you stand and what to fix first.
Mapped across Australian psychosocial risk duties, codes and guidance, with jurisdiction-specific requirements built in.
Developing readiness. Strong hazard identification; verification evidence is the priority gap. Twelve actions identified.
Psychosocial hazard regulations and codes of practice are in force in every Australian state and territory. This is no longer a coming change.
Inspectors ask a specific set of questions — and they ask for documents, not intentions. What you can produce on the day is what counts.
Directors and officers must be able to show they've verified the organisation is managing psychosocial risk — and verification lives in documents, not intentions.
Surveys and risk assessments are genuinely valuable — they tell you how work feels, and they can even form part of your consultation evidence. But an inspector asks a different question: what can you demonstrate? Identified hazards, mapped controls, review, records. That evidence lives in your documents — and RiskProof scores it.
Your existing WHS policies, risk registers, training records, consultation minutes, incident procedures. No new documents required to start.
Every document is classified against the psychosocial hazard requirements of the states you operate in, plus the Commonwealth layer — including state-specific rules like Queensland's sexual harassment prevention plan.
An Inspection Readiness Score out of 100, broken down across the four questions a regulator asks, with your gaps ranked so you know exactly what to fix first.
Strip away the legal language and an inspection asks one question of every hazard relevant to your workplace: can you demonstrate four things?
Have you identified and assessed this hazard?
A risk register that names each hazard, characterises the exposure, and reflects your actual workplace — not a generic template.
Have you controlled it — and controlled it correctly?
Controls mapped to each hazard, with evidence you considered redesigning the work before falling back on training and policy.
Do you know your controls are working?
Consultation with workers, review of controls, and evidence that what's written down is happening in practice.
Can you produce the record?
Dated, retrievable documentation of all of the above — the difference between having done the work and being able to prove it.
"If a regulator came today, how well could we show we have met our duty?"
That's the question a board, CFO or audit committee must be able to answer. RiskProof turns it from an uncomfortable unknown into a number, a breakdown, and a plan.
Not a report — a working view of your evidence: what's missing, why every number is what it is, and proof of the ground you've covered.
Written prevention plan not documented — mandatory in QLD
Controls not mapped to the assessed exposure
Controls in place — review records missing
Illustrative views of the RiskProof platform.
The score isn't the destination; it's the starting line with a map. RiskProof turns your result into a path a board can govern and a regulator can verify.
Every gap is identified and prioritised by exposure — the work list writes itself, worst-first.
Each rating traces to the document, the section, and a recorded rationale. No score without the why — that's evidence, not opinion.
Remediate the priority gaps and run the assessment again. Watch the score move because the evidence moved.
Every assessment is dated and kept — demonstrable diligence over time, ready for the board pack or the inspector.
Regulatory exposure is what brings most organisations to the table — but it isn't the only return. Psychologically healthy work is better-performing work, and the evidence you build in RiskProof pays off well beyond the inspection:
The hazards regulators name — unreasonable demands, poor support, harmful behaviour — are the same forces behind turnover, absence and disengagement. Managing them is a performance decision, not just a legal one.
Psychological injury claims are among the costliest and slowest to resolve. Documented, working controls are your best lever on both frequency and severity.
The question "can you evidence how you manage psychosocial risk?" increasingly arrives from procurement panels and insurers, not just inspectors. Now you have an answer with a date on it.
We're inviting a limited number of Founding Members at launch. The exchange is simple: you get terms that won't be offered again; we get a published case study and your honest feedback shaping the roadmap.
Year 1 pricing, across every tier.
Direct input into the roadmap, and priority onboarding with our team.
Founding intake closes when places are filled. Your pricing tier is locked at signing — grow your headcount without your price moving.
A 30-minute demo with our team. Bring your questions; we'll show you exactly how your documents become a score.
Book a demo